Getting scooped by 85-year-old Tom Wolfe

Tom Wolfe, you old rascal! You’ve done it again. You’ve taken on the entire academic field of linguistics – as an outsider, a mere journalist – and played your snappy Emperor-has-no-clothes game on them. Bingo!

wolfe-4-5-13-1

Wolfe at W&L booksigning, 2013. Photo by me.

And once again, you’ve stolen one of my ideas. But then, I never did anything with it. You did. Good show!

Getting my Harper’s magazine out of the mailbox recently, I couldn’t believe Wolfe, at age 85, was again doing what he did in Harper’s back in 1975. Back then, I was just starting out as a newspaper reporter when I read that long cover story, “The Painted Word,” with a kid’s excitement. Here was a funny, intellectual journalist, a Virginia neo-duelist taking on the pretensions of all those abstract expressionist painters – Mark Rothko, Jasper Johns, Morris Louis, Helen Frankenthaler. They were gods where I had just graduated from college, Bennington College. Wolfe deflated them all with good old reporting and satire.

Now, almost every year since I’ve been teaching journalism at Washington & Lee University, I’ve seen Wolfe visit, increasingly stooped and guarded in his fancy white suits, two-tone shoes, white-framed reading glasses, and for an honorary degree, white academic robe. He is a W&L alumnus, class of ’51. I remain in amused awe of his work – his New Journalism, good fat novels, moral mockery, punctuation!!!! But he was looking in decline.

Not at all!!! He has a new nonfiction book out now – The Kingdom of Speech, excerpted in the current Harper’s as “The Origins of Speech – In the Beginning was Chomsky.”

When I saw that, I had an Emersonian moment.

Ralph Waldo Emerson wanted Americans to realize that we were geniuses, every single one of us. But we fail to realize our genius, he said, because we defer to others – to Europeans, to experts, to published writers. Emerson virtually invented American individualism, and maybe he was a little too successful in getting everybody else to come around to that belief.

But anyway, when I saw that Tom Wolfe had done a number on “the origins of speech,” I thought of what Emerson said about the embarrassing experience of recognizing our own thoughts – my ideas – in someone else’s writing. “In every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts: they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty.”  You can find that in Emerson’s essay “Self-Reliance.”

Wolfe’s insight is that language is the distinguishing characteristic, “the attribute of attributes,” of the human species. Now that might seem obvious. But there’s a second part: Human language is like nothing else in the known universe, from subatomic particles to sex-drives in pigeons to every known physical law. What is it then, this very thing that makes us human – and accounts for our incredible success as a species?

We don’t know. They don’t know. It’s a mystery. If it’s not like anything else we know in the animal kingdom, then it didn’t evolve. Wolfe rejects the Darwinian view, and says language was invented. It is the human thing.

No one knows how it originated. No one has discovered a “primitive” language – except maybe a heroic linguist working in the jungles of Brazil who figures in Wolfe’s new book. In any case, we have a lot of theories and a lot of data about language, but we don’t really have a picture of what it is like. Of what it is. It’s bizarre.

Another Southern writer, the novelist Dr. Walker Percy, published academic articles on this failure to understand the bizarre thing, human language, back in the 1950s. Like Wolfe, Percy coyly noted that the weirdness of human language baffled all scientific theories. Back then, it was B.F. Skinner who tried to explain language as merely behaviorism – our animal attribute, like a dog doing a trick for a bone. Noam Chomsky at MIT destroyed that theory, and Percy admired Chomsky’s respect for the bizarreness of language. Now Wolfe is mocking Chomsky’s theories.

But the point is, we just don’t know. And that is an idea I have toyed with ever since I absorbed Walker Percy’s brilliant skepticism. I’m no Creationist. Journalists don’t know anything. But they do tend to know when people who claim to know things don’t, really. I have for many years found it interesting that we don’t really know the origin of this most central fact of our human story. “In the beginning was the Word” makes as much sense as anything.

There are two other great mysteries I have long been obsessed with, but never pursued. I wish Tom Wolfe would report on these. One is the fact that we don’t really know how life – DNA – originated. And two, we don’t know how anything – matter itself – came into being. If Wolfe doesn’t report on those questions, somebody should.

[this is in the Roanoke Times, Sept. 11, 2016]

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Teaching my old beat — covering schools

JOUR395 F17 Specialty Reporting (Education)
Douglas O. Cumming, associate professor

Notes toward a SYLLABUS – 8/27/16

This course fulfills the requirement for a 3-credit specialty reporting class required for majors in the Journalism sequence. Journalism and Strategic Communications majors must have taken J201 as a prerequisite. Juniors and seniors with other majors are welcome, especially those minoring in education or education policy.

In Jour 395, students will learn about:

  • key institutions that shape and influence this field

Local public and private schools and universities, school districts (their administration and school boards), state Department of Education, U.S. Department of Education, state and national laws and policies pertaining to education (and legislative and funding bodies responsible for these); organizations of teachers/professors, principals, administrators, school boards, parents, and students; colleges for teacher training and research on teaching and learning.

  •  specific terms essential to understand to report and write about the topic with authority

Education insiders and experts use a lot of jargon. Sometimes their obscure terms need to be understood and translated. Educationese can be shorthand for a significant set of meanings, or they contain a history that needs to be told in a nutshell. Other times, the jargon is smoke an education reporter should learn to fan away: it can be merely the empty code that members of a sect use to distinguish insiders from outsiders, or the trick bureaucrats and politicians employ to avoid accountability.

  •  credible resources and sources to which a reporter can turn for stories on this topic

Ed Beat: Education Writers Association (join it, consider attending an EWA workshop or following the listserv, and bookmark the website for backgrounders), The Hechinger Report, Journalism Center on Children & Families (University of Maryland J school), Education Week, Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, Pew Research Center (Education).

K-12 student achievement: NAEP (National Assessment of Education Progress), IPEDS (DOE data on higher ed), Institute for Education Statistics (IES), state and local assessment offices, and for a dissenting view, FairTest.

Professional education organizations: e.g. National School Boards Association;  National Association of Secondary School Principals , etc.

  •  specific journalistic associations for writers in this field

For Ed Beat writers: EWA (see above), SPJ, Spencer Foundation, Poynter Institute.

  •  specific ethical issues that reporters encounter in this field

Ethics: Sarah Carr’s standards & ethics for education reporting.

Students will read exemplary examples of the particular type of specialty reporting and practice the craft themselves through the reporting and writing of numerous stories.  When possible, the class will meet with veterans in the field through class visits or Skype sessions.

 Some award-winning examples:  of Boston Globe columnist Farah Stockman’s Pulitzer-winning columns on busing crisis 40 years after;  other EWA award winters; Tampa Bay Times’ “Failure Factories” , Baltimore Sun’s “Unsettled Journeys,” blogs from Valerie Strauss’ “Answer Sheet” blog in Washington Post, Sara Gregory’s series on Rethinking Discipline, and Columbia Dispatch project she helped, won the Pulliam First Amendment Award; a Washington Post story on a bereaved father’s promise to help other Asian-American parents understand their children’s urge to assimilate. A Center for Public Integrity article on Virginia’s high rate of suspensions. Articles by the professor from when he was senior education writer at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

 Also: Students must cover (and find news from) school board meeting, do a profile of a student and a profile of teacher (ideally, around an issue or narrative), and complete a final in-depth multi-media project. This is the minimal requirement for news stories that a student will produce.

And: A unit on the history of American education, its philosophical and political battles, and how it has been constructed in popular culture and covered in mass communication, from Joseph Rice’s series in Forum (1890s) to coverage of A Nation at Risk (1983) and  test scores under NCLB. (Lawrence A. Cremin volumes on American education; literary nonfiction from the classroom perspective such as by Kozol, Kidder, etc, and portrayal in film).

And: Students will establish contact with an education reporter early in the term and follow that reporter’s work and social-media presence. By the end of the term, the student will write a report on that education-beat reporter that must be shared with the reporter before being submitted for a grade.

Possible guests in class or by Skype: Sara Gregory of Roanoke Times, Aaron Richardson of web-only Charlottesville Tomorrow, Maureen Downy of Atlanta Journal Constitution, Emily Richmond of EWA, Sarah Carr of The Teacher Project at Columbia University School of Journalism.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Almost Heaven

Steve tearing down ceilingIt’s a convenient catastrophe for us, another post-Katrina experience just an hour and fifteen minutes to the west. There is a house in Caldwell, W. Va., one among hundreds, soaked by the Flood of ’16 and abandoned by a widow lady who drives a bus for Mountain Transportation Authority. We feel that R. E. Lee Memorial Church can take on this house and bring Martha Elmore back home. We could bring this home to better condition even than its antediluvian state. Jerry Nay, remember, organized eight trips to New Orleans, and Steve Shultis was part of that Operation Golden Rule. Now, the human need is not far over the state line around Lewisburg, W. Va.

We might also become neighbor-friends with St. James Episcopal Church there in Lewisburg.

Steve was smote by the call to help after that deadly deluge that hit the Greenbrier Valley on June 23. So he roared over the mountains in his Harley last Thursday for what he calls V.R. – visual reconnaissance.

Contact was made. Established comm (Steve’s Marine talk) with the very young Rev. Joshua Saxe, rector; Trish Parker, staff, and Crissy, a gal who is helping at the rectory). Logistics prob: we brought shovels and crowbars for demo, not Jerrytools for drywall. But then it turned out, a lot more demo was needed before we could get to drywall. “Like when you go to war,” says Steve, who was reminding me of Buzz Lightyear, “you don’t want the cooks and the bakers coming first.” St. James is filled to brimming with donations. Busy in the vortex of the learning curve, it is longing to be a church again.

Under the Chinaberry tree

A truck in Martha’s backyard under the chinaberry shade tree.

Steve, Jerry and I drove there in two cars Wednesday the 6th. Sunshine turned to drizzle when we crossed into West Virginia. Lewisburg is about the size and feel of Lexington. We dropped off the stuff R.E. Lee parishioners had left for us and went to work.

Jerry met the AmeriCorps folks at the Greenbrier Volunteer West Virginia reception center (hotline: 304-808-1872). Steve and I drove to Martha’s house (5846 Monroe Draft, Caldwell), as Father Josh told us to. It’s about six miles east of Lewisburg, just off Route 60. Martha wasn’t there because she had to go back to work, but the Cyrus family was inside – Ron Lee Cyrus, a retired truck driver and mechanic with bad lungs from his time in the military, his wife Drema, and their college-student daughter Lakin, called “Sunshine.” The Cyrus family has taken in Martha. Drema and Martha are close friends and sing in a church choir together, although the Cyruses are Missionary Baptist and Martha is Pentecostal Holiness.

Doug in the houseSteve and I picked up where the Cyruses left off putting down plywood subfloor in the front room. Job finished, we moved on to ripping down the rotting ceiling, spilling its blown insulation down on donated blue-plastic drop cloths. It’s just a start. As we worked, highway crews were surveying the ruined road (also called Highway 63) that crosses Howard Creek (the one that flooded this area) to a one-lane tunnel. A few hundred yards downstream, the creek hits the Greenbrier River. A helicopter whumped overhead still looking for the body of a 14-year-old girl missing in the flood.

St James

The entryway to the parish house of St. James Episcopal Church, Lewisburg, W. Va.

Steve, Jerry and I will be meeting Friday with Father Tom and others to sketch out a plan to rebuild Martha’s house over the coming months, however long it takes. It’s just a tiny help in a devastated area of West Virginia, but it’s a focus that we feel will bring rewarding results and living relationships.

Steve outside

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Periodical Room

The RoomIn the 1920s, according to the sign outside the heavy door, DeWitt Wallace spent countless hours in the high-ceilinged sanctum within, reading and condensing magazine articles. This was how he filled Reader’s Digest, the unorthodox little magazine he and his wife, Lila, had launched in 1922, their only child. At first, they didn’t bother with advertising or writers or illustrators. It was all about circulation, which by 1946 reached about eight million. Reader’s Digest became the most widely read magazine in the world.

I brought my magazine class of 14 undergraduates to this Periodical Room of the main New York Public Library building on 5th Avenue. It’s an awesome space, although there were no magazines in sight. Instead, almost every wooden chair lined up on both sides of long tables was occupied by someone working on a MacBook. My students sized up the place in a jiffy, and with my bemused permission left the room and the building for free time in the city. With their iPhones in hand, they had better things to do than waste time in this silent tomb of twentieth century print culture.

But I took the road less traveled by. I asked at the window for copies of some magazines from 1967. Sorry, the man said, we keep only recent issues here. He sent me walking down a long hallway to the room with old periodicals. There, researchers at tables and microfilm machines were digging their gopher holes into history, but still I didn’t see any magazines. I asked at the desk for The Saturday Evening Post and Look from ancient times when Joan Didion and George Leonard were writing about Haight-Ashbury for those magazines.

First, I needed to fill out the form for a library card. Done. Then I needed to fill out a request for the bound copies of Look for the years I wanted. Done. It would be up from the vaults . . . in about 40 minutes. Meanwhile, here’s the microfilm for the Saturday Evening Post issues I wanted. Sorry, none of the microfilm machines were available in this room. I was directed to yet another room down more long hallways.

Have my students ever used a microfilm machine? I doubt it. It took a while to get that giant toaster working. The Post, once the most popular magazine in America, was running some pretty good articles in ’67 on a fire-fight in Vietnam, by an American soldier who was in the middle of it, and on the Mamas and the Papas. The magazine would be dead within two years.

Back in the old periodical room, four very heavy volumes of Look had arrived. I found a full-page ad from the ad bureau of the Magazine Publishers Association. Here was the desperate pitch from America’s last great general interest magazines: “The magazine is a treasury of contemporary ideas and information. It is traditional in its consistent quality from one issue to the next. It is modern in its treatment of an infinite variety of subjects. It is influential in its continuous introduction of new thoughts, styles and trends.” A photograph of a young woman who might have just arrived in Manhattan right out of Sarah Lawrence, thoughtfully drinking something dark through a straw at an outdoor table. “Her presence creates a stir,” the caption says. “Conversations pause. Activities cease.”

The conversations resumed, the activities picked up, the magazines died, time marched on. What was that about? I went back to the DeWitt Wallace Periodical Room to contemplate, once more, what David Sumner’s book calls The Magazine Century. The majestic room has thirteen murals of the great magazine publishing houses in Manhattan, part of the room’s restoration in 1983 underwritten by DeWitt Wallace legacy funds.

These were grand buildings, the Puck Building, Harper’s, the Look Building, Herald Square, Time-Life Building, the Hearst Building. Some are still around, re-purposed. Time Inc. has moved downtown. The Art Deco Hearst Building has become the base of a dazzling 44-floor glass tower clad in diamond-shaped facets. We would hear from the head of magazine marketing in that building the next day, and the students would be given good news about Hearst’s peak profits last year, from using multiple platforms nimbly and targeting native advertising.

Magazines, it seems, will survive. But something troubles me about how sluggish I felt trying to dig into the great magazines of the past. I don’t blame my students for getting out of the New York Public Library as fast as they could. It’s a beautiful building, but in their world it’s a dead tomb of dead books and magazines that aren’t even out in the open. As the man at Hearst would tell us, with an iPhone you don’t want advertising or irrelevant content. You want what you want, when you want it. How many “snap”? he asked, meaning Snapchat. All 14 raised their hands. And how many regularly read magazines? A tentative pause, and only about half the hands went up. And this was for a class called “The Magazine: Past, Present and Future.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lou Hodges v. the W&L Board of Trustees

I just received the sad news that Lou Hodges, the elder statesman of this Journalism & Mass Communications department,  has died at the age of 83. Farmer, preacher, professor, profane and funny Christian ethicist, the grumpy and joyous man who stuck his head in my office to bark “Impersonating a scholar again, I see,” he will be missed.  A student of mine wrote this illuminating story about Lou for a class I taught a few years ago.

By Mark Gensburg, ‘16

Civil rights legend Martin Luther King Jr., in the midst of one of his toughest protest campaigns, almost came to give a speech at the very place where Robert E. Lee is buried, Washington & Lee University.

Lou Hodges mug1

Lou Hodges

In 1961, associate professor of theology Dr. Lou Hodges took two vans full of students over the Blue Ridge to Lynchburg to watch a speech of Martin Luther King Jr. Not long after that, these students asked King to lead a seminar on Christian ideals at Washington and Lee.

Yet the University Christian Association (UCA), which was in charge of the seminar and of which Hodges was the faculty advisor, decided on a 7-2 decision to first seek the formal approval of the board of trustees to invite King.

Much to the dismay of Hodges and the UCA, the board of trustees denied the group permission to invite him. With no justification for its decision, the board quickly came under fire from both the faculty and students alike. And Dr. Hodges led the charge.

Quoted in the Oct. 20, 1961, issue of the Ring-tum Phi, Hodges said, “The board gave us an answer, but no excuse.”

Soon a firestorm of contempt aimed at the board of trustees swept across campus. The decision was decried in five different issues of the Ring-tum Phi and in a survey presented on Oct. 27, 1961, no student on campus could be found who supported the board’s apparently arbitrary decision.

The controversy spread and was headline news in newspapers as far away as Nova Scotia. Closer to home, it was publicized in the Roanoke Times and Virginia Inquirer.

The school and its reputation, it seemed, was being dragged through the mud. Critics from inside and out called the decision to prevent Dr. King from speaking as a decision to restrict the students’ “freedom of inquiry.” Many charged that the board was politicizing the students’ education and the Ring-tum Phi cried that the decision violated the students’ “liberty of mind.”

It was at this point that Hodges was summoned to speak privately with Fred Cole, president of the University.

“Well this will be the dismissal of me,” Hodges recalled in an interview in December 2012. “I had only been on for one year. I thought that I would be fired.”

Hodges was not fired. In fact, he went on to get tenure and teach at W&L for another four decades. He pioneered W&L’s ethics-in-the-professions series, which spawned the journalism ethics chair that he held until retiring in 2002. He came to be known nationally as one of the pioneers of journalism ethics education.

President Cole was not even upset with the controversy the King invitation had caused, said Hodges.

“Invitations of speakers should never need to go to the board of Trustees,” Hodges recalled President Cole saying.

“A new rule was created which dealt with the board [of trustees] and got it fixed that the board would never again do what they did to me.”

Eventually the controversy faded and life on campus returned to normal. Yet, Professor Hodges remained in contact with Dr. King. He said he even received a letter from King from the Birmingham jail in 1963 – not the famous one King wrote from that jail cell, to moderate white ministers in Birmingham, criticizing them for seeking patience from protesters.

While the decision to prevent King from speaking was never reversed, the conflict resulted in the a slew of expanded freedoms for the department of religious studies.

Although the trustees never released a reason for their decision, Hodges suspects that it was based in racial prejudices.

“The group seemed to think ‘Negro’ speakers were inferior to white people,” he said.

That is only his hypothesis. But this is a fact he could utter with a smile on his face: “Now faculty can invite whoever they want.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

In Close Vote, R.E. Lee Memorial Church Retains Its Name

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. Nov. 16, 2015

The lay governing body of Lexington, Va.’s historic Episcopal church voted 9-6 to remove the name R.E. Lee from the church’s name, falling one vote short of the super-majority of 10 it needed to make the change.

In concluding an emotional discussion that has animated the congregation for five months, the Vestry voted Monday by secret ballot while 33 parishioners silently observed. The 15-member Vestry had decided earlier that such a momentous decision needed the support of at least two-thirds of the Vestry.

RE Lee signWhile the vote leaves “R.E. Lee” in the name, the Vestry followed this vote with near-unanimous approval of adding “Episcopal” to the official name, and creating a new sign that displays that name and adds “Founded as Grace Church.”

The church was founded in 1840 mainly to provide Episcopal services for cadets at the newly establish Virginia Military Institute in the heavily-Presbyterian town of Lexington, Va. It was called Grace Church by the time Robert E. Lee arrived in Lexington in September 1865, the revered leader of a defeated Confederate army. Lee, who had agreed to be president of Washington College, joined Grace Church and was elected senior warden. He worshipped at the church and led the Vestry as senior warden until his death at age 63 in October 1870. He was also instrumental in the construction on the adjacent college campus of a chapel that became Lee Chapel, where Lee and members of his family are buried.

After Lee’s death, the church became “Grace Memorial Church,” and the college, a totally separate entity, was re-named Washington and Lee. In 1883, a larger church building, the current stone Gothic Revival structure at the corner of W. Washington Street and Lee Avenue, began holding services. In 1903, the Vestry re-named the church R.E. Lee Memorial, although no record can be found of reasons for this change or a debate over it. This year is the church’s 175th Anniversary, which was celebrated this month with a reception after an All Saint’s Day Choral Evensong service Nov. 1.RE Lee 1870

Off and on, members of the church have quietly discussed whether the name was inappropriate or misunderstood in the 21st century as the name for a church seeking to be, like all Christian churches, part of the “Body of Christ.” But loyalty to tradition and attachment to the name as an identity made the issue too emotional for an all-out debate – until this summer. Two weeks after the horrific fatal shooting of nine leaders of an African Methodist Episcopal church in Charleston, S.C., a member of R.E. Lee Memorial Church wrote a letter to the church rector, senior warden and junior warden saying she felt that, in the wake of the tragedy, it was “time for us to have a frank, Christ-centered discussion about the name that our church has borne since 1903.” The church leaders responded by presenting the issue to the Vestry in July, leading to months of discussion and discernment through forums, house meetings and a survey sent to all 390 active adult members of the church.

The Vestry had previously decided to respond to the question with a vote at its monthly meeting Nov. 16. It also decided that, because of the deeply felt and consequential weight of the decision, a name-change would require a super-majority of at least 10 votes on the 15-member Vestry.

Some Vestry members made statements after the vote. The Vestry has set up a special email account for anyone wishing to contact the body on the matter, warden@releechurch.org.

***

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two of my published articles on Marshall Frady

The late Marshall Frady, a New Journalism magazine writer from Georgia, wrote in a way that gave some of us a sugar high. Others felt his prose was too rich. Anyway, when I dip back into his books, I find myself writing down his phrases in a journal. Like this, on where Will Campbell found his ministry (the rural South where Trump would find support): “. . .the shabby outer precincts of the nation’s promise.” Or on Campbell himself: “. . his trust in all the mysterious supernatural machineries and alchemies of the Incarnation, the Blood Atonement. . .”

Here are two 2014 articles I wrote based on my research in the Frady Papers at Emory, one published in Literary Journalism Studies and the other in Journalism History.

‘Just as I Am’? Marshall Frady’s Making of Billy Graham

Cumming ‘So Splendid It Hurts,’ article in Journalism History Spring 2014 (40,1) pp. 59-64.

Jesse Fidel & Marshall

Jesse Jackson, Fidel Castro, and Marshall Frady, who seems happy to have finally met Fidel, nearly 40 years after Frady’s failed adolescent efforts to cover the Revolution.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Foreword” to Bylines book

from the book Bylines: Writings from the American South, 1963 to 1997, by Joseph B. Cumming, Jr., 2010.

Bylines cover6Joe Cumming was a most unusual sort of journalist. For twenty-two years he covered the American South for Newsweek magazine, the very years when the civil rights struggle (an epic clash in constitutional law, then in soul-force protest) made that territory a beat with as much excitement and consequence as one finds anywhere in the history of journalism. Yet he came to this job with zero training, no college courses in journalism, nor a single day of work at a newspaper or wire service. His preparation was writing poetry and radio dramas, selling building supplies and making commercial films for a few years. His education, from childhood through the University of the South at Sewanee, was a deep liberal-arts immersion in literature and history. An unusual journalist, yes, but then, he is a most unusual sort of person.

Joseph Bryan Cumming, Jr., grew up on genteel, easygoing Cumming Road, a world that looked down a little, in physical elevation as well as social class, on the rest of the historic river city of Augusta, Georgia. This world was at once vanishing to the tiny phosphorescence of a firefly, and looming large as the harbor view from a tall ship’s topmast. It was a micro-world filled with historic time. Family stories harked back to when President Buchanan made Uncle Alfred governor of the Utah Territory or the night President Taft dropped in on the Cumming house for dinner.

Born on February 26, 1926, Joe was the only son of two strong leaders of local civic life, his father being a prominent lawyer and scion of what some encyclopedias refer to as “one of the most distinguished families in Georgia.” Joe Jr. was a skinny lad with a Roman nose, soft mouth, ears that stuck out, and aster-blue eyes. He had permission and a capacity to dream away the time on a pony or at the piano. His great inheritance was such stuff as dreams are made on, not privilege or wealth. In a spiritual sense, he joined American life, just missing World War II action but not the jazzy action that followed. He got his ears pinned back, got married, settled in Augusta, sired four children, then set out for Atlanta, like so many other small-town Southerners, to find his destiny.

That destiny turned out to be magazine journalism. William A. Emerson Jr., a friend who had worked on the Harvard Advocate and at Colliers, had set himself up as a one-person regional bureau in Atlanta for Newsweek in the early fifties. By 1957, after the year-long Montgomery bus boycott had grabbed the world’s attention and before the Little Rock crisis erupted, Emerson realized he needed help. Riots were breaking out. Instead of getting an experienced news hand—someone like wire-service trouper Claude Sitton, who was about to open a New York Times bureau in Atlanta—he hired Joe Cumming, a sweet-natured gentleman with a poet’s love of words. It was a risky, intuitive gamble.

Within four years, Emerson had moved on to higher realms at Newsweek in New York, leaving his younger colleague as bureau chief. Cumming was ambitious and scared, so he learned fast what New York expected. Throughout the sixties, the teletype clattered in the bureau offices. The old rotary phones ran up enormous long-distance tolls. Sunday papers from every major Southern city grew in columns against a wall like giant termite colonies. He hired and groomed reporters who would go on to run other Newsweek bureaus around the world or become legendary as reporters and writers: Gerald Lubenow, Karl Fleming, Andrew Jaffe, Hank Leiferman, William Cook, Marshall Frady, Eleanor Clift. He selected talented stringers in newsrooms throughout the South to keep watch on the action. The files he sent to New York, in which he rendered exhaustive reporting into sparkling prose, would end up as fragments—a quote or an anecdote here and there in someone else’s sparkling prose. There were few by-lines at Newsweek in those days. The reporting was always re-written.

image002But the dreamer had his writing dreams, and like Joseph in Egypt, this Joe could interpret dreams. He had a feeling that he could bear witness to what was happening in the South in some higher form than his Newsweek files. Something told him there was a place for his literary imagination—the peculiar Southern music and the metaphoric flight pattern of his private writing. Now it just so happened that a new kind of journalism was gestating in the precincts of New York in the early sixties. At the New York Herald-Tribune’s Sunday magazine and at Esquire, editors Clay Felker and Harold Hayes (both of them dapper Southern boys) were taking literary leaps with non-fiction writing, going a little wild and crazy to capture the maelstrom energy of this new thing, the sixties. Their magazine experiments would soon be called the New Journalism. Cumming was visiting New York, a guest of Newsweek, when he gained entry into Hayes’s office to pitch a story idea, something like “So What Did You Do in the War, Daddy?” Hayes liked the idea, and told him to send it over. So he did. And that story, the first of the published freelance articles printed in this collection, appeared in the November 1963 issue of Esquire under the title “The Art of Not Being 37.”

Two things about that article are worth noting here. One is that it is not about what this Newsweek bureau chief was covering in the South, but is about his own subjective experience as a 37-year-old American at this particular time and place in the history of civilization. The New Journalism opened up the space of subjective personal experience like a Moog synthesizer or an acid trip. It was perfect for Joe Cumming. And the second thing is this: His article appeared in the same issue with the very first “New Journalism” article by a new talent named Tom Wolfe. Wolfe’s article was titled “There Goes [Varoom! Varoom!] That Kandy-Colored Tangerine-Flake Streamline Baby.”

If some “news muse,” as he puts it (or dumb luck) launched his freelance writing career, I feel blessed with a similar luck or muse for having grown up with Joe Cumming as a father. Falling asleep upstairs in the Cumming house was a cozy way to go. We children could drift off to the sounds of Daddy on the grand piano downstairs, stroking the rich chords and tripping down arpeggios of “Stardust” or “Moonglow.” Or your last dot of consciousness might be the sound of loud storytelling and crowd laughter. Or when only Daddy was still up, under the last light on, I could faintly hear the sweet pattering of his big manual typewriter. He was working on another freelance piece.

But the best part for me came after leaving home for college. That’s when he and I began writing letters back and forth, typewritten riffs of mutual encouragement, show-off literary allusions, and preposterous verbal experimentation. It was a private thing we had going, and I thought I would never find a legitimate description of it until I read this in Nabokov’s Speak, Memory, about his White Russian father: “Our relationship was marked by that habitual exchange of homespun nonsense, comically garbled words, proposed imitations of supposed intonations, and all those private jokes which is the secret code of happy families.” Within my first week as a college freshman, under the spell of courses in history and poetry, I was pecking out trippy letters home. He wrote back, “Your communiqués zip silver about the emptying space, enlivening the growing of light into September.” Once, after he saw a performance of Dylan Thomas’s “Under Milkwood,” he let the fireworks fly in a letter to me. He got rolling on pure sounds of “flush and rush out all old dried up dreams and schemes and new hatched sky-stretched visions from seed to pumpkin, from acorn to solemn oak from molecule to the great globe itself and carefully from the atom to be strewn across the galaxy.” (He still says blessings at family meals like this, too.) Not that anybody can say what it means but let me quote a paragraph from that letter of December 2, 1972:

And last night dreaming of being with mountain people, old Foxfire sorts, in stone crumbling chimneys, good dry-straw-smelling people as I knew were dwelling in my [mind] when hearing and breathing Under Milkwood. For I seem more and more to be drawn toward people I cover [like] Pentecostal preachers (see Newsweek, lead anecdote was mine, Nov. 27th, page 93), country music fans (page 62) in Wheeling, W.Va. . . And just now walking past Union Mission realizing my life’s chance would be to listen with those derelicts and harvest their tales, each representing in human terms the malfunctioning of society. And this is somehow opposite of what I sense is the Political Radical glorification of The People. I feel very out with that impulse, for it is all external to heart and deals with people externally. Liberals and radicals are too often bright pastless people who are bored with human relating and who have no ear for music. It’s cold and insect-like.

Perhaps it was as odd as Joe Cumming becoming a journalist, but in June of 1974 I drove from my graduation at a liberal arts college in Vermont, with no training or education in journalism, straight to my first real job as a summer intern in the newsroom of the Raleigh Times. I learned fast, and kept working for newspapers for the next twenty-six years, with a couple of interludes editing regional magazines and a couple of reverse sabbaticals on Ivy League campuses. We continued writing our glimmering letters, my father and I, and sharing poems we wrote. But my earnest career plan was to make it in the ink-stained profession on my own, not as Joe Cumming’s son.

I think I did pretty well on my own feet, though in truth those last two decades of the Golden Age of American newspapers (a century from about 1890 to 1990) offered a gush of advertising dollars that made it fairly easy for a young reporter to flourish if he or she made half an effort. In Raleigh, I concluded that the excitement of writing up the civil rights movement was just about played out. (In the summer of 1975, the murder trial of a poor black woman named Joan Little, who had ice-picked her white jailor after he forced his porky self on her, drew some of the smart reporters who would go on endlessly seeking a dénouement to the great Homeric saga.) I was lucky to work next at the Providence Journal-Bulletin over a thirteen year period when it was admired as “a writer’s paper.” I thought my connection with my father then was private and precious, like his letters. But here and there, I would run into journalists who wondered if I might be related to. . .[in tones of awe] . . .Joe Cumming. I was not at all embarrassed to acknowledge it. Then they would offer some hushed confession or animated story, the gist of which was that Joe Cumming had changed their life. He had either hired them as a stringer, or taken the time to encourage their writing, or shown them how a journalist could have a sensitive or dreamy side, or made them snap out of their dreamy side, or he simply passed through their consciousness as that piano-playing, poetry-spouting Newsweek bureau chief in Atlanta. I had this experience at surprisingly remote spots, far off on a press junket to see the turbines of Hydro Quebec on the tundra of James Bay, on another junket to the oil patch around Monroe, Louisiana, and even when I dropped into a wire-service bureau in South Africa. Apparently, I was not the only one he had taught and inspired.

In fact, he had been a sort of ring-leader of literary journalism in Atlanta. He had organized various floating downtown lunches for the journalists who worked in the Atlanta bureaus of national news organizations, a weekly salon that for awhile he named “Tuesday Tables.” Dinner parties at the Cumming house, or weekend house parties at our place in the mountains in North Georgia (see the exquisite essay on “Tate” on page xx) would often draw writer friends like Frady, Pat Conroy, Anne Rivers Siddons, and after his return to Atlanta, big Bill Emerson. Later, I would find Daddy’s name exalted in the acknowledgements of their books or disguised in their novels as a character or an anecdote. Occasionally, a well-known writer visiting Atlanta for an article would wind up at our house over drinks or dinner, luminaries like Mary McCarthy and Garry Wills. My parents once took Washington Post publisher Kay Graham to a play.

The end of the seventies swerved, and flung Cumming into a new calling—higher education. He spent a year as a visiting instructor at the University of Georgia, and then earned a master’s degree in liberal arts at Emory University. His master’s thesis was a case study of civil rights journalism, based on the most independent knowledgeable reporter in Mississippi, Bill Minor. During the eighties, he taught in the department of mass communications and theater at what was then called West Georgia College in Carrollton. All the while, he continued to freelance, writing regular columns on the book page of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about writers and readings. Then he cranked out opinion pieces in other venues, mostly about his well-lathed mental map he called “the new learning.” These ideas are the refinements of a lifetime of wondering, thinking and writing, a lovely cat’s cradle of connections between teaching and learning, news and history. Listen folks, he just wants to pass it on. Take it and use it, somebody, please.

But there was always a bigger project he had in mind. Even in his first letter to me when I went off to college, he referred to beginning work on his movie, tomorrow. “I have a deadline upcoming,” he said, “when the director will be in town.” A few years later, the idea had grown to be a book, a novel. “I take off next week for three weeks to begin the novel,” he wrote me in April of ’72. Later, it grew to be The Project, a little self-mockingly, even acquiring a secret code number. Something was always getting in the way. One more “utterly last statement about the South. . .for a crummy magazine. . .and it is damn good.” Or reading the clips of another young kid fresh out of college who wanted to write for magazines. Or a family vacation, or family crisis. Or Tuesday Tables or another great house party. Or writing an anniversary poem, or another letter to me. Or directing a musical comedy, or writing one. Always something, distractions that piled on other distractions to make up, over the years, the whole of who he really was and is. Like “The Other Wise Man” in that Henry Van Dyke story, he was forever being pulled off his task of reaching Bethlehem by the needs of people on the way, and by his own delight in meeting those needs. Only after a lifetime of frustration in the pattern is it revealed that meeting such needs was, in truth, reaching Bethlehem. Still, he longed to see it in a book, something we can all pull down from the shelf and enjoy, and pass along.

So this, finally, is that book.

Doug Cumming, Ph.D.
Washington & Lee University
Lexington, Virginia

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

History, Types I and II

They tied a body bag around Cyrus Hall McCormick. The next day, I discovered what they were doing to this bronze campus statue of one of our biggest donors. They were catalyzing the greenish patina back to its original bronze glow.

McCormackMany visitors to Washington & Lee mistake this statue, at a distance, for Robert E. Lee. There is a certain sameness to the look of Prominent Men of the 19th century – the beard, hair flying out at the ears, a chest thrust out like a Pouter pigeon’s from an unbuttoned topcoat, a large Roman nose. The visitors who come looking for Lee’s crypt in Lee Chapel, and their misreading this statue, or confusing my Episcopal church, R.E. Lee Memorial, for Lee Chapel – all this makes me think of the difference between popular history and the history that historians claim. It’s the difference between public celebrations of history and what we mean when we say the “History Division” of the AEJMC.

I would refine that and say there are actually three kinds of history. There’s popular history. Then there is what historians say happened – with younger historians always coming up with new interpretations as time throws new light and shadows, new evidence and loss of artifacts over the significant past. Then, thirdly, there’s what actually happened, an epistemic abstraction that will always elude us.

There’s a brass plaque in the entryway of my building, installed by Sigma Delta Chi 44 years ago on the very day I write this, recognizing that W&L was where “professional education for journalism began.” It was not so much education “in” or “for” journalism, but a liberal arts education and scholarships “for” poor printers, to educate them as future newspaper editors. “Initiated by General Robert E. Lee, then President of Washington College, courses designated to prepare newspapermen for positions of leadership in a defeated South were taught from 1869 to 1878, the first formal instruction in journalism in the history of education.” A local newspaper editor was designated as an instructor in “typography,” and was to put the press-scholarship lads to work in his print shop for an hour each day.

You might say it was not really “professional” education either, in that the rise of a profession of journalism came later, culminating in schools of journalism that began at the University of Missouri in 1908 (see the wonderful chapters collected in Journalism 1908: Birth of a Profession, Betty Houchin Winfield, ed.). Leading editors of the day, including Frederick Hudson of the New York Herald and E.L. Godkin of the New York Evening Post, scoffed at Lee’s idea that journalism could be taught in college.

Lee is an interesting figure of public history. Whatever role he may have played in initiating journalism education, after he died in 1870, his role as a symbol of an honorable-though-defeated white South was confiscated by a powerful ideology. Over the next seven decades, Southern leaders of both high and low station appropriated Lee as a saintly icon of state’s rights and Southern identity. Today, looking back as historians, we see these as codes for the South’s racial apartheid and white supremacy.

Lee as icon was not abused as brazenly as was the Confederate battle flag, waved by a revived KKK and Southern resisters in the 1950s. But as University of Georgia historian James C. Cobb said in his Founder’s Day lecture at W&L earlier this year, Lee became part of a public history, what Robert Penn Warren called the big myths we live by, and in our own living, constantly remake. “Silenced by death,” Cobb said, “Lee could not protest.” Lee had accepted blame for losing at Gettysburg, but after Appomattox, remained silent about the war (and refused to give interviews to journalists). Cobb said this was to turn people’s attention from the war and toward the future. But that didn’t stop those who would not only erect monuments to him, “but actually make a monument of him.”

President Eisenhower hung a portrait of Lee in the White House as one of his military heroes. At W&L, where historical flags of the Confederacy last year were removed from around Lee’s recumbent statue in Lee Chapel for display in the museum below, it is “Mr. Lee” the reconciler and education reformer who is honored today. Still, the contested meanings of public history are gusting strong around Lee. Students who had won a Robert E. Lee Research grants for summer research found it helped in job and grad-school applications to remove that from their résumés, and the university has since changed the name of that grant.

And how about R.E. Lee Memorial Episcopal Church, where he was a devout worshipper and senior warden when it was called Grace Church here in Lexington? “I thought Episcopal churches named for people all took the name of saints,” visitors would say, and the joke was that locals would respond, “Yes, and what’s your point?”

But the name of the leading rebel general who fought to preserve a system that accommodated slavery is not one that well represents the Christian gospel. Not today. I recently invited our director of Special Collections to look at a 1906 engraving of General Lee hanging in the parish house, with a Confederate flag and a W&L flag crossed underneath. I asked, Could we swap that with a reproduction of a Michael Miley photograph of “Mr.” Lee in civilian clothes? He thinks this might be done.

It’s a small thing, against the great ungovernable tides of public history and popular (or unpopular) symbols. But like that statue of Cyrus Hall McCormick (related to Joseph Medill, Col. Robert McCormick and Alicia Patterson), the symbols of our public history need to be occasionally worked on to recover something of their original nature.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Singular Critter

“The case of the three species of protozoan (I forget the names) which apparently select differently sized grains of sand, etc., is almost the most wonderful fact I ever heard of. One cannot believe that they have mental power enough to do so, and how any structure or kind of viscidity can lead to this result passes all understanding.”

— Charles Darwin, letter to W.B. Carpenter, 1872

A life form found in many eras
Back as far as they can tell
Is called the foraminifera,
Ubiquitous and single-cell.

The thing that makes so many care a
Lot about this bagatelle —
This tiny foraminifera —
Is that it forms a tiny shell.

This makes it be the mini-bearer
Of Life’s long age, capital L,
This runty foraminifera,
The oldest creature in fossil.

And still it lives within e. terra
Oceanus, swamp or well.
Greetings, foraminifera,
We praise the tree from which you fell.

We saw delight, va bene era,
In classes summoned by the bell:
The School on Foraminifera
Is under Urbino’s campanell’.

This 600-million-yearer
Has a product it can sell.
“Look here!” the foraminifera
Tells BP, Exxon-Mobil, Shell.

But science with its skinny mirror
Has other, purer clientele.
Our Brother Foraminifera
Speaks of life twixt heaven and hell.

School on Foraminifera

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment